Tinsley v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 12, 2010·No. 09-8109·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8109

JAMES D. TINSLEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SHERIFF RICK DAVIS; CAPTAIN GILBERT; COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR STEVE WYATT; COUNTY OF HENDERSON, N.C.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00379-GCM)

Submitted: April 13, 2010 Decided: May 12, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James D. Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James D. Tinsley appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s orders. Tinsley v. Sheriff Rick Davis, No. 1:09-cv-

00379-GCM (W.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2009; Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tinsley v. Davis, (4th Cir. 2010).

Tinsley v. Davis (Tinsley v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related