Tinsley v. City of Winston-Salem
140 S.E. 192, 194 N.C. 808, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 246
Opinion
This case was considered by the Court upon a former appeal, which is reported in 192 N. 0., p. 597. This decision becomes *809 tbe law of tbe case so far as tbe subsequent trial is concerned. Nobles v. Davenport, 185 N. C., 162; Mfg. Co. v. Hodgins, 192 N. C., 577.
After a careful examination of tbe record and briefs of counsel for tbe parties, tbe court is of tbe opinion that no error of law was committed upon tbe trial, and tbe judgment of tbe trial court is upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tinsley v. City of Winston-Salem, 140 S.E. 192, 194 N.C. 808, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 246 (N.C. 1927).
140 S.E. 192 (Tinsley v. City of Winston-Salem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Broadaway v. King-Hunter, Inc.
73 S.E.2d 861 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)