Tinsley v. City of Winston-Salem
This text of 140 S.E. 192 (Tinsley v. City of Winston-Salem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was considered by the Court upon a former appeal, which is reported in 192 N. 0., p. 597. This decision becomes *809 tbe law of tbe case so far as tbe subsequent trial is concerned. Nobles v. Davenport, 185 N. C., 162; Mfg. Co. v. Hodgins, 192 N. C., 577.
After a careful examination of tbe record and briefs of counsel for tbe parties, tbe court is of tbe opinion that no error of law was committed upon tbe trial, and tbe judgment of tbe trial court is upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 192, 194 N.C. 808, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinsley-v-city-of-winston-salem-nc-1927.