Tinsley v. City of Richmond

368 U.S. 18, 82 S. Ct. 137, 7 L. Ed. 2d 86, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 293
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 23, 1961
Docket315
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 368 U.S. 18 (Tinsley v. City of Richmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tinsley v. City of Richmond, 368 U.S. 18, 82 S. Ct. 137, 7 L. Ed. 2d 86, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 293 (1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Ball
368 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 U.S. 18, 82 S. Ct. 137, 7 L. Ed. 2d 86, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinsley-v-city-of-richmond-scotus-1961.