Tinsley v. City of Richmond

368 U.S. 18, 82 S. Ct. 137, 7 L. Ed. 2d 86, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 293
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 23, 1961·No. 315·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tinsley v. City of Richmond, 368 U.S. 18, 82 S. Ct. 137, 7 L. Ed. 2d 86, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 293 (1961).

368 U.S. 18 (Tinsley v. City of Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Ball
368 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1961)