Tinsky v. Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) CRAIG TINSKY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-0246 (EGS) ) JEWISH ALLIANCE FOR GREATER ) RHODE ISLAND, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On April 25, 2014, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, to transfer
[ECF No. 3]. The Court issued an Order [ECF No. 5] advising the plaintiff of his obligations
under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the
motion. Specifically, the Order warned the plaintiff that, if he did not file his opposition by June
2, 2014, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an
opposition nor has requested more time to do so. Therefore, the Court will deny the defendants’
motion to transfer without prejudice, grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss as conceded and
dismiss this action without prejudice.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Signed: EMMET G. SULLIVAN United States District Judge
Dated: June 30, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tinsky v. Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island (Tinsky v. Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.