Tino v. Outdoor Media, Inc.
This text of 242 So. 2d 196 (Tino v. Outdoor Media, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment appealed from in this case dismissed an amended complaint whereby the appellants sought damages for breach of a ten year lease of certain real estate made to the appellee as lessee. The trial court was correct in holding the lease was not enforceable. The real estate involved was owned m an estate by the entireties by appellants who were husband and wife.
The lease was signed by the husband but was not signed by the wife. Failure of the wife to join and sign the lease made this ten year lease defective. See Richart v. Roper, 156 Fla. 822, 25 So.2d 80, 81. The lease was defective also because not witnessed as required by § 689.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 So. 2d 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tino-v-outdoor-media-inc-fladistctapp-1970.