Tino v. Outdoor Media, Inc.

242 So. 2d 196
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 1970·No. No. 69-1077·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from in this case dismissed an amended complaint whereby the appellants sought damages for breach of a ten year lease of certain real estate made to the appellee as lessee. The trial court was correct in holding the lease was not enforceable. The real estate involved was owned m an estate by the entireties by appellants who were husband and wife.

The lease was signed by the husband but was not signed by the wife. Failure of the wife to join and sign the lease made this ten year lease defective. See Richart v. Roper, 156 Fla. 822, 25 So.2d 80, 81. The lease was defective also because not witnessed as required by § 689.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tino v. Outdoor Media, Inc., 242 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

242 So. 2d 196 (Tino v. Outdoor Media, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S & I Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc.
36 So. 3d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Skylake Insurance Agency, Inc. v. NMB Plaza, LLC
23 So. 3d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Sheehan v. Hubbard
378 So. 2d 1238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Kupperman v. Powell
371 So. 2d 1104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
In Re Adoption by Cooper
242 So. 2d 196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)