Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 846 F.3d 1190
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 16, 2018·No. 17-2194·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TINNUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, ZURU LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

TELEBRANDS CORPORATION, BULBHEAD.COM, LLC, BED BATH & BEYOND, INC., Defendants-Appellants ______________________

2017-2194 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:17-cv-00170-RWS-JDL, Judge Robert Schroeder, III. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

THOMAS MANSFIELD DUNLAP, Dunlap Bennett & Lud- wig PLLC, Leesburg, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by DAVID LUDWIG, ERIC LORENZ OLAVSON, ROBERT D. SPENDLOVE; JEFFREY AHDOOT, Wash- ington, DC; BRIAN M. KOIDE, Vienna, VA; CORTLAND CHRISTOPHER PUTBRESE, Richmond, VA.

DAVID MICHAEL UNDERHILL, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by STACEY K. GRIGSBY, ERIC J. MAURER; ELANA ARAJ, ROBERT THOMAS MALDONADO, Cooper & Dunham, LLP, New York, NY. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 16, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2018).

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation (Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.