Tinnin v. Treasurer of Missouri

275 S.W.3d 320, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1522
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 18, 2008
DocketED 91550
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 S.W.3d 320 (Tinnin v. Treasurer of Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tinnin v. Treasurer of Missouri, 275 S.W.3d 320, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1522 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington v. Martin
275 S.W.3d 320 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 S.W.3d 320, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinnin-v-treasurer-of-missouri-moctapp-2008.