Tinnin v. Treasurer of Missouri

275 S.W.3d 320, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1522
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 2008·No. ED 91550·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tinnin v. Treasurer of Missouri, 275 S.W.3d 320, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1522 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

275 S.W.3d 320 (Tinnin v. Treasurer of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington v. Martin
275 S.W.3d 320 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)