Tinnell v. the Louisville Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Tinnell v. the Louisville Railway Co.

62 S.W.2d 467, 250 Ky. 245, 1933 Ky. LEXIS 665

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

DecidedJune 13, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 62 S.W.2d 467 (Tinnell v. the Louisville Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tinnell v. the Louisville Railway Co., 62 S.W.2d 467, 250 Ky. 245, 1933 Ky. LEXIS 665 (Ky. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

This is a companion case of Jannie Tinnell v. Louisville Railway Co., 250 Ky. 245, 62 S. W. (2d) 467, this day decided.

The suit was brought by the appellant, Tom Tin-nell, her husband, against the same defendants for .damages which he suffered by reason of the loss of his wife’s society and companionship due to her injuries sustained in the manner outlined in that opinion.

Except as to the character of damages claimed, the petition is in all respects the same as that filed by the wife. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the other case, it was proper to sustain the demurrer of the railway company, which resulted in the dismissal of the petition as against it.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI