Tinman v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan
722 N.W.2d 881, 477 Mich. 918
Opinion
Tzvih TINMAN, a minor, by his next friend(s) Ilene TINMAN and/or Michael Tinman, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tinman v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, 722 N.W.2d 881, 477 Mich. 918 (Mich. 2006).
722 N.W.2d 881 (Tinman v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.