Tinman v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan
722 N.W.2d 881, 477 Mich. 918
This text of 722 N.W.2d 881 (Tinman v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tinman v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, 722 N.W.2d 881, 477 Mich. 918 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Tzvih TINMAN, a minor, by his next friend(s) Ilene TINMAN and/or Michael Tinman, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
722 N.W.2d 881, 477 Mich. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinman-v-blue-cross-and-blue-shield-of-michigan-mich-2006.