Tinkoff v. Gold
This text of 313 U.S. 545 (Tinkoff v. Gold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. It appears that on a motion to vacate an order approving a supersedeas bond given on the appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals, the appeal was dismissed for failure of appellants to produce the surety on the bond as required by the court, and later the Circuit Court of Appeals denied appellants’ motion to vacate that order of dismissal. The petition for certiorari is granted and the order of dismissal is reversed upon the ground that while the failure to produce the surety for examination was an adequate reason for vacating the approval of the supersedeas bond, it did not justify the dismissal of the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 U.S. 545, 61 S. Ct. 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinkoff-v-gold-scotus-1941.