Tinker v. Tinker

274 N.W. 742, 281 Mich. 145, 1937 Mich. LEXIS 853
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 1, 1937
DocketDocket No. 107, Calendar No. 39,597.
StatusPublished

This text of 274 N.W. 742 (Tinker v. Tinker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tinker v. Tinker, 274 N.W. 742, 281 Mich. 145, 1937 Mich. LEXIS 853 (Mich. 1937).

Opinion

*146 Potter, J.

August 19, 1936, plaintiff filed a bill for divorce against defendant. From a decree for plaintiff, she appeals.

Prior to the divorce suit in question, November 9, 1935, defendant filed a bill for divorce in the circuit court for Lapeer county against plaintiff, who caused her appearance to be entered therein and filed an answer denying plaintiff’s right to relief. April 2, 1936, a property settlement was made, executed and acknowledged by the respective parties, and that cause dismissed.

By the bill filed in this cause, plaintiff asks not only for divorce, but attacks the property settlement made April 2, 1936, upon the ground of fraud.

At the time the settlement was made there seems to have been more or less bickering as to the value of the property, who had contributed thereto, the amount of such contributions, the terms of settlement, and the right of plaintiff to participate in the bonus received, or expected to be received, by defendant from the government of the United States by reason of his having served in the army during the world war. All property matters were talked over, the property listed, the valuation arrived at, and the property divided. Each of the parties to the divorce proceeding ivas represented at the settlement by able counsel. Neither party was satisfied with the settlement. The trial court found no fraud in the settlement then made, and we are unable to find any. It appears to have been valid.

Decree of the trial court affirmed, without costs.

Fead, C. J., and North, Wiest, Butzel, Bushnell, Sharpe, and Chandler, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 N.W. 742, 281 Mich. 145, 1937 Mich. LEXIS 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinker-v-tinker-mich-1937.