Tinker v. Hanks
531 U.S. 987, 121 S. Ct. 476, 148 L. Ed. 2d 450, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9073, 69 U.S.L.W. 3332, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 12031, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 7487
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 13, 2000
DocketNo. 99-7682
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 531 U.S. 987 (Tinker v. Hanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tinker v. Hanks, 531 U.S. 987, 121 S. Ct. 476, 148 L. Ed. 2d 450, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9073, 69 U.S.L.W. 3332, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 12031, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 7487 (2000).
Opinion
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of [988]*988petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Artuz v. Bennett, ante, p. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tucker v. Kingston
538 F.3d 732 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)
Mitchell v. McCaughtry
291 F. Supp. 2d 823 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2003)
Daniel Siebert v. Donal Campbell
334 F.3d 1018 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
Michael A. Newell v. Craig Hanks
283 F.3d 827 (Seventh Circuit, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
531 U.S. 987, 121 S. Ct. 476, 148 L. Ed. 2d 450, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9073, 69 U.S.L.W. 3332, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 12031, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 7487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinker-v-hanks-scotus-2000.