Tinker v. Hanks
531 U.S. 987, 121 S. Ct. 476, 148 L. Ed. 2d 450, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9073, 69 U.S.L.W. 3332, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 12031, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 7487
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 2000·No. No. 99-7682·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of [988]*988petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Artuz v. Bennett, ante, p. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tinker v. Hanks, 531 U.S. 987, 121 S. Ct. 476, 148 L. Ed. 2d 450, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9073, 69 U.S.L.W. 3332, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 12031, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 7487 (2000).
531 U.S. 987 (Tinker v. Hanks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tucker v. Kingston
538 F.3d 732 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)
Mitchell v. McCaughtry
291 F. Supp. 2d 823 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2003)
Daniel Siebert v. Donal Campbell
334 F.3d 1018 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
Michael A. Newell v. Craig Hanks
283 F.3d 827 (Seventh Circuit, 2002)