Tiniko Braddy Thompson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 2025·No. 4D2025-0544·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

TINIKO BRADDY THOMPSON, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D2025-0544

[May 7, 2025]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Susan L. Alspector, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-007484-CF10A.

Tiniko Braddy Thompson, Ocala, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005); Padgett v. State, No. 3D25-0349, 2025 WL 1172840, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 23, 2025).

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tiniko Braddy Thompson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Tiniko Braddy Thompson v. State of Florida (Tiniko Braddy Thompson v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ratliff v. State
914 So. 2d 938 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)