Tingley v. Wardrop
741 N.W.2d 22, 480 Mich. 944
Opinion
William Q. TINGLEY, III, William Q. Tingley, and Daniel R. Bradley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Proto-Cam, Inc., Bend Tooling, Inc., and Tennine Corporation, Plaintiffs,
v.
Robert F. WARDROP, II, William J. Fisher III, Todd R. Dickinson, Wardrop & Wardrop, P.C., Dickinson Wright, PLLC, Fisher & Dickinson, P.C., 900 Monroe LLC, 940 Monroe LLC, Pioneer Incorporated, City of Grand Rapids, John H. Logie, Dykema Excavators, Inc., and Fifth Third Bancorp, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
*23 MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tingley v. Wardrop, 741 N.W.2d 22, 480 Mich. 944 (Mich. 2007).
741 N.W.2d 22 (Tingley v. Wardrop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allstate Insurance Company v. a & a MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
741 N.W.2d 22 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)