Tingley v. International Dynelectron Co.

75 A. 1102, 76 N.J. Eq. 337, 6 Buchanan 337, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 329
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 A. 1102 (Tingley v. International Dynelectron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tingley v. International Dynelectron Co., 75 A. 1102, 76 N.J. Eq. 337, 6 Buchanan 337, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 329 (N.J. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon—15!

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jarecki v. Manville Bakery, Inc.
71 A.2d 228 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 A. 1102, 76 N.J. Eq. 337, 6 Buchanan 337, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tingley-v-international-dynelectron-co-nj-1909.