Tingle v. State Ex Rel. Winston County
76 So. 998, 200 Ala. 700
Opinion
This action was brought by the state, for the use, etc., against Tingle and his sureties 'on his official bond as tax collector of Winston county. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal. Really, there is in the brief for appellant no adequate insistence for error; yet there is a measure of merely off-hand assertion of criticisms of the action of the court in a few particulars. None of these possess any merit. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tingle v. State Ex Rel. Winston County, 76 So. 998, 200 Ala. 700 (Ala. 1917).
76 So. 998 (Tingle v. State Ex Rel. Winston County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.