Tingle v. State Ex Rel. Winston County

Supreme Court of Alabama

Tingle v. State Ex Rel. Winston County

76 So. 998, 200 Ala. 700

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 14, 1917

Docket6 Div. 517.

StatusPublished

This text of 76 So. 998 (Tingle v. State Ex Rel. Winston County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tingle v. State Ex Rel. Winston County, 76 So. 998, 200 Ala. 700 (Ala. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

McCLELLAN, j.

This action was brought by the state, for the use, etc., against Tingle and his sureties 'on his official bond as tax collector of Winston county. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal. Really, there is in the brief for appellant no adequate insistence for error; yet there is a measure of merely off-hand assertion of criticisms of the action of the court in a few particulars. None of these possess any merit. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCLELLAN, j.

This action was brought by the state, for the use, etc., against Tingle and his sureties 'on his official bond as tax collector of Winston county. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal. Really, there is in the brief for appellant no adequate insistence for error; yet there is a measure of merely off-hand assertion of criticisms of the action of the court in a few particulars. None of these possess any merit. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 So. 998, 200 Ala. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tingle-v-state-ex-rel-winston-county-ala-1917.