Tingle v. Parten
3 Edw. Ch. 228, 1838 N.Y. LEXIS 267, 1838 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 30
Opinion
Notice of this motion was regular. The complainant’s delay warranted it; and the intention to make it has had the effect of expediting the cause. An [229] order to dismiss the bill, for want of prosecution, would not now be proper; but the complainant must pay the costs of this motion to be taxed. '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tingle v. Parten, 3 Edw. Ch. 228, 1838 N.Y. LEXIS 267, 1838 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 30 (N.Y. 1838).
3 Edw. Ch. 228 (Tingle v. Parten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.