Tingle v. Parten
3 Edw. Ch. 228, 1838 N.Y. LEXIS 267, 1838 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 30
This text of 3 Edw. Ch. 228 (Tingle v. Parten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tingle v. Parten, 3 Edw. Ch. 228, 1838 N.Y. LEXIS 267, 1838 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 30 (N.Y. 1838).
Opinion
Notice of this motion was regular. The complainant’s delay warranted it; and the intention to make it has had the effect of expediting the cause. An [229]*229order to dismiss the bill, for want of prosecution, would not now be proper; but the complainant must pay the costs of this motion to be taxed. '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Edw. Ch. 228, 1838 N.Y. LEXIS 267, 1838 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tingle-v-parten-nychanct-1838.