Ting Realty Corp. v. United Welfare Fund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ting Realty Corp. v. United Welfare Fund

50 A.D.2d 879, 377 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11767

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1975·Published

Opinion

— In an action inter alia to recover damages for fraud and usury, defendants Sutton and Poll appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 7, 1974, which denied their motion inter alia to dismiss the second amended complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Appellants’ time to answer is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In our opinion, the second amended complaint adequately and fairly sets forth causes of action to which appellants can respond. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action inter alia to recover damages for fraud and usury, defendants Sutton and Poll appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 7, 1974, which denied their motion inter alia to dismiss the second amended complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Appellants’ time to answer is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In our opinion, the second amended complaint adequately and fairly sets forth causes of action to which appellants can respond. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Ting Realty Corp. v. United Welfare Fund, 50 A.D.2d 879, 377 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

50 A.D.2d 879 (Ting Realty Corp. v. United Welfare Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.