Ting Realty Corp. v. United Welfare Fund
This text of 50 A.D.2d 879 (Ting Realty Corp. v. United Welfare Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action inter alia to recover damages for fraud and usury, defendants Sutton and Poll appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 7, 1974, which denied their motion inter alia to dismiss the second amended complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Appellants’ time to answer is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In our opinion, the second amended complaint adequately and fairly sets forth causes of action to which appellants can respond. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 879, 377 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ting-realty-corp-v-united-welfare-fund-nyappdiv-1975.