Tinder v. Menocal

335 So. 2d 571, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13898
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 22, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1213
StatusPublished

This text of 335 So. 2d 571 (Tinder v. Menocal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tinder v. Menocal, 335 So. 2d 571, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13898 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Cleveland v. City of Miami, Fla.1972, 263 So.2d 573; Acosta v. Daughtry, Fla.App.1972, 268 So.2d 416; Seaboard Coastline Railroad Company v. Magnuson, Fla.App.1974, 288 So.2d 302.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland v. City of Miami
263 So. 2d 573 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. Magnuson
288 So. 2d 302 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Acosta v. Daughtry
268 So. 2d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 So. 2d 571, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinder-v-menocal-fladistctapp-1976.