Tindall v. State

138 So. 3d 545, 2014 WL 1686467, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6210
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 2014
DocketNo. 4D12-2324
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 So. 3d 545 (Tindall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tindall v. State, 138 So. 3d 545, 2014 WL 1686467, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6210 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Guzman v. State, 110 So.3d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). We certify conflict with Thomas v. State, 78 So.3d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), and certify the following questions to the Florida Supreme Court:

1. DOES GRAHAM V. FLORIDA, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), APPLY TO LENGTHY TERM-OF-YEARS SENTENCES THAT AMOUNT TO DE FACTO LIFE SENTENCES?
2. IF SO, AT WHAT POINT DOES A TERM-OF-YEARS SENTENCE BECOME A DE FACTO LIFE SENTENCE?

Affirmed; conflict certified; questions certified.

WARNER, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herbert Michel v. State
159 So. 3d 233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 3d 545, 2014 WL 1686467, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tindall-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.