Tindall v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Tindall v. Murphy

23 F. Cas. 1291

DecidedDecember 15, 1823

StatusPublished

This text of 23 F. Cas. 1291 (Tindall v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tindall v. Murphy, 23 F. Cas. 1291 (Ark. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OP

THE COURT.

The only

question presented by the record is, whether the execution offered in evidence by the appellant was properly excluded. We are of opinion that it was incompetent evidence. To have authorized its introduction, the judgment upon which it issued should also have been produced. 3 Litt. 14; 1 Salk. 409 ; 2 Johns. 281; 12 Johns. 213; 2 South. [5 N. J. Law] 813; 20 Johns. 338; 5 Serg. & R. 332; 1 A. K. Marsh, 158; 1 B. Mon. 94; 1 Gilman, 136. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OP

THE COURT.

The only

question presented by the record is, whether the execution offered in evidence by the appellant was properly excluded. We are of opinion that it was incompetent evidence. To have authorized its introduction, the judgment upon which it issued should also have been produced. 3 Litt. 14; 1 Salk. 409 ; 2 Johns. 281; 12 Johns. 213; 2 South. [5 N. J. Law] 813; 20 Johns. 338; 5 Serg. & R. 332; 1 A. K. Marsh, 158; 1 B. Mon. 94; 1 Gilman, 136. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F. Cas. 1291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tindall-v-murphy-ark-1823.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack