Tindall v. Exchange Bank
This text of 41 S.E. 504 (Tindall v. Exchange Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On February 22, 1901, a judgment was rendered in the superior court of Bibb county, to the effect that Tindall, the plaintiff in error, as receiver in the case of Culver et al. v. Macon Hardware Co. et al., was liable for the sum of $6,106.96, and commanding him to immediately pay the same into court. In the present bill of exceptions error is assigned upon this judgment, for various reasons therein set forth. The identical questions thus presented were before this court and passed upon by it in the cases of Tindall v. Nisbet, 113 Ga. 1114, and 114 Ga. 224. The decisions rendered in those cases are absolutely conclusive of all the questions now made; and as full reports have been made in those cases of all the facts in this complicated litigation, it is unnecessary to again set them forth here.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 S.E. 504, 115 Ga. 153, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tindall-v-exchange-bank-ga-1902.