Tindall v. Exchange Bank

41 S.E. 504, 115 Ga. 153, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 334
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 2, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

On February 22, 1901, a judgment was rendered in the superior court of Bibb county, to the effect that Tindall, the plaintiff in error, as receiver in the case of Culver et al. v. Macon Hardware Co. et al., was liable for the sum of $6,106.96, and commanding him to immediately pay the same into court. In the present bill of exceptions error is assigned upon this judgment, for various reasons therein set forth. The identical questions thus presented were before this court and passed upon by it in the cases of Tindall v. Nisbet, 113 Ga. 1114, and 114 Ga. 224. The decisions rendered in those cases are absolutely conclusive of all the questions now made; and as full reports have been made in those cases of all the facts in this complicated litigation, it is unnecessary to again set them forth here.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little and Lewis, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tindall v. Exchange Bank, 41 S.E. 504, 115 Ga. 153, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 334 (Ga. 1902).

41 S.E. 504 (Tindall v. Exchange Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nisbet v. Tindall
41 S.E. 569 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)