Tindall v. Cunningham
265 A.D. 1031, 39 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6697
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 6, 1943
StatusPublished
This text of 265 A.D. 1031 (Tindall v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tindall v. Cunningham, 265 A.D. 1031, 39 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
Opinion
(Allen v. LaVaud, 213 N. Y. 322; Matter of Smith, 95 N. Y. 516.) All concur, except Crosby, P. J., not voting. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to set aside conveyance of realty. The order grants a motion of defendants for a nonsuit and cancels the Us pendens.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Allen v. . La Vaud
107 N.E. 570 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
In Re the Probate of the Will of Smith
95 N.Y. 516 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 1031, 39 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tindall-v-cunningham-nyappdiv-1943.