Tinckum's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Tinckum's Appeal

3 Walker 38

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 15, 1884

DocketNo. 302

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Walker 38 (Tinckum's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tinckum's Appeal, 3 Walker 38 (Pa. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court affirmed the decree of the Court below, on Feb. 18,1884, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

The uncertain memory of the principal witness in behalf of the appellant, as well as the absence of specific and clear facts, in her testimony; were insufficient evidence to defeat the judgment. The Court was fully justified in discharging the rule.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court affirmed the decree of the Court below, on Feb. 18,1884, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

The uncertain memory of the principal witness in behalf of the appellant, as well as the absence of specific and clear facts, in her testimony; were insufficient evidence to defeat the judgment. The Court was fully justified in discharging the rule.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Walker 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinckums-appeal-pa-1884.