Tinch v. Video Industrial Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Tinch v. Video Industrial Services, Inc.

463 S.E.2d 289, 120 N.C. App. 640, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 916

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 7, 1995

DocketNo. COA95-151

StatusPublished

This text of 463 S.E.2d 289 (Tinch v. Video Industrial Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tinch v. Video Industrial Services, Inc., 463 S.E.2d 289, 120 N.C. App. 640, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 916 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

For the reasons stated in Brown v. Friday Services, Inc., 119 N.C. App. 753, 460 S.E.2d 356 (1995), we affirm the entry of summary judgment in this case.

Although plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in hearing defendants’ motion for summary judgment before allowing the parties time for discovery, and before allowing plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint, we find that even if summary judgment was improperly awarded, plaintiff’s case would not have succeeded on the merits because of our holding in Brown v. Friday Services, Inc., 119 N.C. App. 753, 460 S.E.2d 356 (filed August 15, 1995).

Affirmed.

Panel consisting of:

Judges LEWIS, WYNN, and JOHN.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI