Tinao v. State
This text of Tinao v. State (Tinao v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 3G263
m fn
PATRlCK DAVlD TlNAO, Petition ma pm
fW
§§ §§
VS.
STATE OF HAWAYI, Respondent.
ORlGlNRL PROCEEDING
ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the papers submitted by Patrick
David Tinao, it appears that the papers seek relief by way of a
writ of prohibition and/or mandamus, but we are unable to
1 ascertain from the papers the basis for the relief sought.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate
court shall process the papers as a petition for a writ of prohibition and/or mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT lS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
prohibition and/or mandamus is dismissed.
DATED: H<>n@iuiu, Hawai‘i, Jamlary 1_2, 2010_
W»/~»~
/@--\
Q§n@E.Rh&H4Q\'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tinao v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinao-v-state-haw-2010.