Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.

819 A.2d 840, 263 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 133
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 25, 2003·No. SC 16970·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 74 Conn. App. 760 (AC 21992), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s granting of summary judgment based upon its determination that a certain lease provision was an option to renew that required the written consent of the plaintiff and the renegotiation of a new rent?”

Lloyd L. Langhammer, in support of the petition. Kevin J. Burns, in opposition. Decided March 25, 2003

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc., 819 A.2d 840, 263 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 133 (Colo. 2003).

819 A.2d 840 (Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.
814 A.2d 403 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2003)