Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.

Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.

819 A.2d 840, 263 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 133
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 25, 2003
DocketSC 16970
StatusPublished

This text of 819 A.2d 840 (Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc., 819 A.2d 840, 263 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 133 (Colo. 2003).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 74 Conn. App. 760 (AC 21992), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s granting of summary judgment based upon its determination that a certain lease provision was an option to renew that required the written consent of the plaintiff and the renegotiation of a new rent?”

Lloyd L. Langhammer, in support of the petition. Kevin J. Burns, in opposition. Decided March 25, 2003

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.
814 A.2d 403 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
819 A.2d 840, 263 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinaco-plaza-llc-v-freebobs-inc-conn-2003.