Tims v. Folsom
535 So. 2d 301, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2737, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5542, 1988 WL 134440
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 1988·No. No. 88-67·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find the circumstances of this case appear to be controlled by the rule pronounced by this court in Mayo v. Dugger, 535 So.2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), On Motion for Rehearing and Clarification. Accordingly, the order denying appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is reversed, [302]*302and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tims v. Folsom, 535 So. 2d 301, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2737, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5542, 1988 WL 134440 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
535 So. 2d 301 (Tims v. Folsom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henderson v. State
543 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)