Timpone v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad

27 Misc. 826, 57 N.Y.S. 827
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedApril 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Misc. 826 (Timpone v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timpone v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad, 27 Misc. 826, 57 N.Y.S. 827 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

Conlan, J.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and! from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

This action was brought to recover for an injury received by the plaintiff while riding upon a wagon driven by one Joseph Rosenweig, whom the plaintiff was employed to assist in delivering candy.

An examination of the record discloses no errors of law calling forva reversal of the judgment. The issues of fact were fairly presented to the jury, and they have disposed of them in favor of the plaintiff. The damages awarded as compensation to plaintiff .are not so large as to show that the jury must have been actuated by passion, partiality, prejudice or corruption. Stephens v. Hudson Valley Knitting Mills Co., 20 N. Y. Supp. 916; Scott v. Sun-Printing & P. Association, 26 id. 619.

Upon the whole record we think the judgment should be- affirmed.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephens v. Hudson Valley Knitting Co.
20 N.Y.S. 916 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Misc. 826, 57 N.Y.S. 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timpone-v-dry-dock-east-broadway-battery-railroad-nynyccityct-1899.