Timoyanis v. Xuanli Tang

2024 NY Slip Op 32303(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedJuly 8, 2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 32303(U) (Timoyanis v. Xuanli Tang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timoyanis v. Xuanli Tang, 2024 NY Slip Op 32303(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

Timoyanis v Xuanli Tang 2024 NY Slip Op 32303(U) July 8, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156976/2023 Judge: Lori S. Sattler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/08/2024 04:55 PM INDEX NO. 156976/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/08/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. LORI S. SATTLER PART 02M Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 156976/2023 PAMELA TIMOYANIS, MOTION DATE 02/05/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 -v- XUANLI TANG, LOXTON, INC.,HARRIS HOME REPAIR AND DEVELOPMENT, INC.,HARRIS HOME REPAIR AND DECISION + ORDER ON DEVELOPMENT CORP., MICHAEL HARRIS, EASTERN LEAF CONSTRUCTION, INC.,WENG W. NG, MOTION

Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT .

In this action for property damage, Plaintiff Pamela Timoyanis (“Plaintiff”) moves

pursuant to CPLR 3215(d) for an order granting default judgment against Defendants Xuanli

Tang, Loxton, Inc., Harris Home Repair and Development, Inc., Harris Home Repair and

Development Corp., Michael Harris, Eastern Leaf Construction, Inc., and Weng W. Ng

(“Defendants”). Plaintiff further moves to consolidate this matter with another matter pending

before this Court under Index No. 151444/2021. Defendants have not answered the Complaint

and submit no opposition to the motion.

A plaintiff demonstrates entitlement to default judgment by submitting proof of service of

the summons and complaint, proof of the facts constituting its claim, and proof of a defendants’

default in answering or appearing (CPLR 3215[f]; Gantt v North Shore-LIJ Health Sys., 140

AD3d 418 [1st Dept 2016]). Here, as to the corporate defendants, Plaintiff has annexed

affidavits of service demonstrating that they were properly served via the Secretary of State

156976/2023 TIMOYANIS, PAMELA vs. TANG, XUANLI ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 001

1 of 5 [* 1] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/08/2024 04:55 PM INDEX NO. 156976/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/08/2024

(NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 4-7). Plaintiff further annexed affidavits of service upon the individual

defendants Xuanli Tang (NYSCEF Doc. No. 3), Michael Harris (NYSCEF Doc. No. 9), and

Weng W. Ng (NYSCEF Doc. No. 10). The Court finds that while service was properly

effectuated on Defendant Xuanli Tang, service was not properly effectuated on Defendants

Michael Harris or Weng W. Ng. These two individual defendants were served by “nail and

mail” pursuant to CPLR § 308(4). As to Harris, the process server made two attempts and

during the second attempt was told that Harris no longer lived at the home as it had been sold.

Nevertheless, the server affixed process to the door of that home and then mailed it to the same

address. No efforts were made to determine Harris’s actual address (NYSCEF Doc. No. 17, 5).

With respect to Ng, the server made one attempt to serve him at a building “with no apartment

provided” and indicated that Ng was not listed as residing there (id. at 6). The server further

claims to have “checked various online websites and phone services” but was unable to find a

listing for Ng at that address. In each instance, the server was required to use due diligence to

obtain Harris and Ng’s whereabouts before resorting to “nail and mail” service, and the Court

finds that the servers failed to do so (see Casanova v Lopez, 225 AD3d 446, 446-447 [1st Dept

2024]).

As to the remaining requirements on a motion for default judgment, Plaintiff submits an

affidavit setting forth the facts as to Defendants’ liability, a copy of the Verified Complaint filed

July 11, 2023 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 2) and confirms that Defendants have failed to appear. The

Court finds that Plaintiff has demonstrated her entitlement to default judgment as to the corporate

defendant’s and Tang’s liability and that she is entitled to an inquest and assessment of damages.

Consolidation is within the discretion of the Court and is appropriate where two actions

involve “a common question of law or fact” (CPLR § 602[a]). The burden is on a party resisting

156976/2023 TIMOYANIS, PAMELA vs. TANG, XUANLI ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 001

2 of 5 [* 2] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/08/2024 04:55 PM INDEX NO. 156976/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/08/2024

consolidation to show that consolidation would be prejudicial (Vigo S.S. Corp. v Marship Corp.

of Monrovia, 26 NY2d 157 [1970]). Courts are inclined to award consolidation where it

promotes efficiency and judicial economy (Amcan Holdings, Inc. v Torys LLP, 32 AD3d 337

[1st Dept 2006]). The Court finds Plaintiff has established that the two actions arise out of the

same set of common facts, namely damage to Plaintiff’s property, that the two actions present

the same issues of law, and that judicial economy is best served by consolidating the two actions.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for default is granted as against Defendants Xuanli

Tang, Loxton, Inc., Harris Home Repair and Development, Inc., Harris Home Repair and

Development Corp., and Eastern Leaf Construction, Inc. and denied as to Defendants Michael

Harris and Weng W. Ng; and it is further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECLARED that Plaintiff Pamela Timoyanis has default

judgment and does recover as against Defendants Xuanli Tang, Loxton, Inc., Harris Home

Repair and Development, Inc., Harris Home Repair and Development Corp., and Eastern Leaf

Construction, Inc., in an amount to be determined at inquest; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, within 20 days from entry of this Order, serve a copy of

this order with Notice of Entry upon the parties or counsel for any represented party or parties,

and upon the Clerk of the General Clerk’s Office, and shall serve and file with said Clerk a Note

of Issue and Statement of Readiness and shall pay the fee therefor, and said Clerk shall cause the

matter to be placed upon the calendar for trial as to damages; and it is further

ORDERED that the consolidation motion is granted and the above-captioned action is

consolidated in this Court with Pamela Timoyanis v. Zhongmeng (U.S.A.), Co. Ltd., Xuanli

156976/2023 TIMOYANIS, PAMELA vs. TANG, XUANLI ET AL Page 3 of 5 Motion No. 001

3 of 5 [* 3] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/08/2024 04:55 PM INDEX NO. 156976/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/08/2024

Tang, Index No. 151444/2022, under Index No. 151444/2022, and the consolidated action shall

bear the following caption:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ____________________________________________X

PAMELA TIMOYANIS,

Plaintiff, Index No. 151444/2021

-against-

ZHONGMENG (U.S.A.) CO. LTD., XUANLI TANG, LOXTON, INC., HARRIS HOME REPAIR AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. HARRIS HOME REPAIR AND DEVELOPMENT CORP., MICHAEL HARRIS, EASTERN LEAF CONSTRUCTION, INC., and WENG W. NG, Defendants.

___________________________________________X

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gantt v. North Shore-LIJ Health System
140 A.D.3d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re the Arbitration between Vigo Steamship Corp.
257 N.E.2d 624 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Torys LLP
32 A.D.3d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 32303(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timoyanis-v-xuanli-tang-nysupctnewyork-2024.