Timothy Young v. United States

465 F. App'x 597
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 2012
Docket10-17916
StatusUnpublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 465 F. App'x 597 (Timothy Young v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timothy Young v. United States, 465 F. App'x 597 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Timothy Doyle Young appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*598 The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action because Young failed to pay the filing fee and failed to comply with the deadline set by the district court for remedying the deficiencies in his in forma pauperis application. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir.2000) (“[P]risoner-plaintiffs seeking to proceed in forma pauperis [must] submit a certified copy of their prisoner trust fund account statement for the previous six months.”); James v. Madison Street Jail, 122 F.3d 27, 28 (9th Cir.1997) (“[T]he rule for timely filing applicable to pro se prisoners ... applies to the filing of trust-account statements as required by § 1915(a)(2).”).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arthur Raffy Aslanian v. Warden
C.D. California, 2025
(HC) Jones v. Trate
E.D. California, 2023
Truonghai Thai Nguyen v. DHS
C.D. California, 2021
Juan Jose Rios v. Neil McDowell
C.D. California, 2021
Hoadena Ingram v. Habeas Corpus
C.D. California, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
465 F. App'x 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-young-v-united-states-ca9-2012.