Timothy Williams v. Kathy Brittain
This text of Timothy Williams v. Kathy Brittain (Timothy Williams v. Kathy Brittain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, : No. 3:25-CV-0338 Petitioner ; (Judge Munley) Vv. : KATHY BRITTAIN, Respondent ;
ORDER AND NOW, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT |S ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioner Timothy Williams’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuan to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. 2. Acertificate of appealability shall not issue, as Williams has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 2€ U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable” whether this court’s procedural rulings are correct, Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Date: _/2 Lalas rae ~ Wa Pein —~ | —- _ JUDGE JULIA K. MU Y □□ d States a Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Timothy Williams v. Kathy Brittain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-williams-v-kathy-brittain-pamd-2025.