Timothy William Underwood v. California
This text of 459 U.S. 1136 (Timothy William Underwood v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
74 L.Ed.2d 983
103 S.Ct. 769
Timothy William UNDERWOOD, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA
No. 82-5448
Supreme Court of the United States
January 10, 1983
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Justice BLACKMUN, with whom Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL join, dissenting.
For the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in Holloway v. Florida, 449 U.S. 905, 101 S.Ct. 281, 66 L.Ed.2d 137 (1980), I would grant the petition for certiorari and afford this case plenary consideration. See also Spaziano v. Florida, 454 U.S. 1037 and 1041, 102 S.Ct. 581 and 583, 70 L.Ed.2d 484 (1981) (dissenting opinions).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 U.S. 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-william-underwood-v-california-scotus-1983.