Timothy Wayne Kemp v. State of Arkansas
Opinion
Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Date: 2022.06.09 Cite as 2021 Ark. 172 12:21:49 -05'00' Adobe Acrobat SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS version: No. CR-98-463 2022.001.20117
Opinion Delivered: October 7, 2021
TIMOTHY WAYNE KEMP PETITION TO REINVEST PETITIONER JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL COURT TO CONSIDER A PETITION V. FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS [PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT STATE OF ARKANSAS COURT, FIRST DIVISION, NO. RESPONDENT 60CR-93-2903]
HONORABLE MARION HUMPHREY, JUDGE
PETITION DENIED.
COURTNEY RAE HUDSON, Associate Justice
Petitioner Timothy Wayne Kemp has filed his second application to reinvest jurisdiction
in the Pulaski County Circuit Court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Kemp
petitions for relief in both CR-95-549, his first direct appeal from his capital-murder
convictions and death sentences, and CR-98-463, his second direct appeal following the
resentencing hearing. See Kemp v. State, 324 Ark. 178, 919 S.W.2d 943 (1996) (CR-95-549);
Kemp v. State, 335 Ark. 139, 983 S.W.2d 383 (1998) (CR-98-463). Kemp’s petitions in both
cases are identical. For the reasons stated in our separate opinion issued today in Kemp v. State,
2021 Ark. 173, CR-95-549, we also deny his petition in the current case.
Petition denied.
Julie Pitt Vandiver, Ass’t Fed. Pub. Def., for petitioner.
Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Kent G. Holt, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2021 Ark. 172 (Timothy Wayne Kemp v. State of Arkansas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.