Timothy Wayne Fisher v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 12, 2015·No. 01-14-00400-CR·Published

Opinion

J!kM^Am„<<m,~^^-.J&^ id^^^m,

y^fc^^GS^^^.^^

TM0W VL tfsm C^USE •* J3Z233S, -msormoF-mm

^yn^iSJQA rtg ?TMg

TO TW£ /4ON0MBU2 JUfi^E OF SAI& COURf; Comes utaw iTHOTfiy Fisher (i>gF&»MriPm-m m Ttfe >&&ME 5ryte hqmbsk msE m s^tes; DHFENMtfT /S Rfi3U6STlMS m ATM* & EXTEHSkM to BBABiB *7P Fim P£R BftrtfF-TO C'GA Court due 7b /*rs Ufck of KhoMjeuse A-a> ay "Uiat 0#a& PR6^& m to the /acr Ms 44wy#* PflovH>s> ^ T#£ ST/KTB THAT Film MS DIRECT APPmL Wrr M$ m$ M iMFT

A* Due to the &tr im pepmwfr is cuRf?sN7iy PM^ W7^i«ri^

._.- „ HECEIVED ' , FIRST COURT OF APPEALS ! HOUSTON, TEXASI '

OCT 1 2 2015

CHRISTOPHER A. PRIME ICLERK mm

W TH6 W OF-

the moti&j aiotjLbm &Wna> ... \£Hm>±*~*.

WORTH TEXAS TX FSDC

DALLAS TX 750 •06 -OCT 2015 FM 7 L

loixxxpa-rk/ TT>. 16%?7 ov)#vW*s ^gus^

/•Trst District courtat appeal ^11^ \smcr cteR^K applet 201 FAfltiM ST

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI