Timothy Walton v. William Martin, and Franklin County Jail Quint Overton Vicky Meadows

983 F.2d 1059, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6236, 1993 WL 3477
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 1993
Docket92-7109
StatusUnpublished

This text of 983 F.2d 1059 (Timothy Walton v. William Martin, and Franklin County Jail Quint Overton Vicky Meadows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timothy Walton v. William Martin, and Franklin County Jail Quint Overton Vicky Meadows, 983 F.2d 1059, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6236, 1993 WL 3477 (4th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

983 F.2d 1059

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Timothy WALTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William MARTIN, Defendant-Appellee,
and FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL; Quint Overton; Vicky Meadows, Defendants.

No. 92-7109.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1992
Decided: January 11, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-12-R)

Timothy Walton, Appellant Pro Se.

William Heywood Fralin, Jr., Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Timothy Walton appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walton v. Martin, No. CA-92-12-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 1, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waid (James Carl, Jr.) v. Blankenship (w.d.)
983 F.2d 1059 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 F.2d 1059, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6236, 1993 WL 3477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-walton-v-william-martin-and-franklin-count-ca4-1993.