Timothy Wade Hall v. Tennessee Department of Corrections Main Hospital Dave Seahorne (Pa's) Fred Takacs and Dr. Nesbitt

831 F.2d 294, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13695, 1987 WL 38648
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 9, 1987
Docket87-5091
StatusUnpublished

This text of 831 F.2d 294 (Timothy Wade Hall v. Tennessee Department of Corrections Main Hospital Dave Seahorne (Pa's) Fred Takacs and Dr. Nesbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timothy Wade Hall v. Tennessee Department of Corrections Main Hospital Dave Seahorne (Pa's) Fred Takacs and Dr. Nesbitt, 831 F.2d 294, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13695, 1987 WL 38648 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

831 F.2d 294

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Timothy Wade HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MAIN HOSPITAL; Dave
Seahorne (PA'S); Fred Takacs; and Dr. Nesbitt,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-5091.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1987.

Before WELLFORD and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges and JAMES HARVEY, Senior District Judge.*

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

It is concluded upon a careful review of the district court record that the district court properly dismissed plaintiff's civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). His claim of medical malpractice cannot support a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in the magistrate's report and recommendation entered April 1, 1986 and adopted by the district court on April 16, 1986. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable James Harvey, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estelle v. Gamble
429 U.S. 97 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Hines (Norman E.) v. General Motors Corporation
831 F.2d 294 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 F.2d 294, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13695, 1987 WL 38648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-wade-hall-v-tennessee-department-of-correc-ca6-1987.