Timothy v. Bowling v. Lori Goff, Becky West, and the Johnson City Police Department

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedMarch 30, 2000
DocketE1998-00820-COA-R3-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Timothy v. Bowling v. Lori Goff, Becky West, and the Johnson City Police Department (Timothy v. Bowling v. Lori Goff, Becky West, and the Johnson City Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timothy v. Bowling v. Lori Goff, Becky West, and the Johnson City Police Department, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

I N T HE C OU RT OF A P P E A L S OF T E N N E S S E E

A T K N OX V I L L E F IL E D Ma rch 30, 2000

C e cil C ro ws on , J r. A p p e l la t e C o u r t C l e rk

T I MOT HY V . B OWL I N G, ) E 1 9 9 8 - 0 0 8 2 0 - C OA - R 3 - C V ) P l a i n t i f f - Ap p e l l a n t , ) ) ) ) ) A P P E A L A S OF R I G HT F R OM T HE v. ) J OHN S ON C I T Y L A W C OU RT ) ) ) ) L O RI G OF F , B E C K Y WE S T , a n d T H E ) J OHN S ON C I T Y P OL I C E DE P A R T ME N T ) ) H ON OR A BL E L E WI S W. MA Y , De f e n da n t s - A pp e l l e e s . ) J UDGE

For Appel l ant For Appel l ee s

T I MOT HY V . B OWL I N G, P r o S e K . E R I C K S O N HE R RI N Mo u n t a i n C i t y , T e n n e s s e e He r r i n , B o o z e & R a mb o J ohns on Ci t y , Tenne s s ee

O P IN IO N

A F F I R ME D A N D R E MA N DE D Sus ano, J.

1 T h e p l a i n t i f f , T i mo t h y V . Bo wl i n g , f i l e d a c o mp l a i n t i n

t hi s ac t i on on J anua r y 16, 1998. Hi s p l e a d i n g , f i l ed pr o s e , i s

e n t i t l e d " C o mp l a i n t f o r C i v i l Ri g h t s V i o l a t i o n , " a n d s e e k s

d a ma g e s a g a i n s t t wo p o l i c e o f f i c e r s o f t h e J o h n s o n C i t y P o l i c e

De p a r t me n t . T h e D e p a r t me n t i s al s o s ued. T h e c o mp l a i n t i s b a s e d

u p o n t h e p l a i n t i f f ’ s a r r e s t f o r d o me s t i c v i o l e n c e , a n a r r e s t ma d e

by t he i ndi v i dual d e f e n d a n t s o n Ma r c h 1 6 , 1993. I t s e e k s mo n e y

d a ma g e s f o r v i o l a t i o n s o f t h e p l a i n t i f f ’ s c i v i l r i g h t s . I n t he

wo r d s o f t h e c o mp l a i n t , i t s e e k s t o i n v o k e c i v i l r i g h t s “ [ t ] h a t

ar e i ndee d pr ot ec t ed by bot h t he Uni t ed S t at es Cons t i t ut i on, as

we l l a s t h e T e n n e s s e e C o n s t i t u t i o n . ” The t r i al c o u r t d i s mi s s e d

t h e c o mp l a i n t b e c a u s e i t f o u n d t h a t t h e c o mp l a i n t wa s f i l e d mo r e

t ha n one y e a r a f t e r t he pl a i nt i f f ’ s a r r e s t . We a f f i r m.

T h e p l a i n t i f f ’ s c o mp l a i n t i n t h e i n s t a n t a c t i o n c o me s

t oo l a t e . To s us t a i n i t s v i a bi l i t y , t he pl a i nt i f f poi nt s t o a

c o mp l a i n t ( " t h e f i r s t c o mp l a i n t " ) f i l e d b y h i m a g a i n s t t h e s a me

d e f e n d a n t s b a s e d o n t h e s a me a r r e s t , wh i c h c o mp l a i n t wa s f i l e d o n

De c e mb e r 1 3 , 1 9 9 4 . T h e f i r s t c o mp l a i n t - - wh i c h a l s o s o u g h t

mo ne y d a ma g e s - - ma k e s a b s o l u t e l y n o r e f e r e n c e s t o a ny c i v i l

r i g ht s or c ons t i t ut i ona l v i ol a t i ons . T h e f i r s t c o mp l a i n t wa s 1 d i s mi s s e d b y v o l u n t a r y n o n s u i t o n J a n u a r y 1 7 , 1 9 9 7 . The f i r s t

c o mp l a i n t a n d t h e i n s t a n t c o mp l a i n t a l l e g e t o t a l l y d i f f e r e n t

c a u s e s o f a c t i o n. T he f i r s t c o mp l a i n t s e e ms t o a l l e g e ma l i c i o us

p r o s e c u t i o n a n d / o r f a l s e i mp r i s o n me n t ; wh i l e t h e c o mp l a i n t i n t h e

i ns t ant a c t i o n a l l e g e s wh a t a mo u n t s t o a 4 2 U . S . C . A . § 1 9 8 3

v i ol a t i on. The r e f or e , t he pl a i nt i f f c a nnot r e l y upon t he f i r s t

1 T h e c o mp l a i n t i n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e w a s f i l e d w i t h i n o n e y e a r o f t h e v o l u n t a r y n o n s u i t ; h o w e v e r , s i n c e t h e g r a v a me n o f t h e p r e s e n t c l a i m i s d i f f e r e n t f r o m t h a t o f t h e f i r s t c o mp l a i n t , t h e s a v i n g s s t a t u t e T . C . A . § 2 8 - 1 - 1 0 5 , i s n o t i mp l i c a t e d .

2 c o mp l a i n t t o t o l l t h e s t a t u t e o f l i mi t a t i o n s a s i t p e r t a i n s t o a n

a l l e g e d v i ol a t i on of hi s c i v i l r i g ht s or ot he r c ons t i t ut i ona l 2 guarant ees.

T h e p l a i n t i f f h a d o n e y e a r wi t h i n wh i c h t o p u r s u e t h e

c l a i ms p r e s e n t l y b e f o r e u s . S e e T. C. A. § 28- 3- 104(a )( 3). See

al s o 29- 20- 305(b) (S upp. 1999). He d i d n o t f i l e w i t h i n t h e

p r e s c r i b e d p e r i o d o f t i me . Acc or di ngl y , hi s cl ai m i s bar r ed.

T h e j u d g me n t o f t h e t r i a l c o u r t i s a f f i r me d . Cos t s on

a p pe a l a r e t a x e d t o t h e a pp e l l a n t . T hi s c a s e i s r e ma n de d f o r

col l ec t i on of cos t s , pur s uant t o appl i ca bl e l aw.

__________________________ C h a r l e s D. S u s a n o , J r . , J .

CONCUR:

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________________ Ho u s t o n M. G o d d a r d , P . J .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________________ D. Mi c h a e l S wi n e y , J .

2 T h i s c a s e i s d i f f e r e n t f r o m E ne r g y S a v i n g P r o d uc t s , i n c . v . C a r n e y , 7 3 7 S . W. 2 d 7 8 3 ( T e n n . C t . A p p . 1 9 8 7 ) . I n t h a t c a s e , t h e c a u s e o f a c t i o n a t t e mp t e d t o b e a s s e r t e d i n t h e s e c o n d s u i t w a s “ n o t t i me - b a r r e d a t t h e t i me o f [ t h e f i r s t s u i t ’ s ] v o l u n t a r y d i s mi s s a l . ” I d. a t 7 8 4 . T h i s f a c t wa s c r u c i a l t o o u r h o l d i n g i n E n e r g y S a v i n g P r o d u c t s , I n c . t h a t t h e s e c o n d s u i t w a s n o t t i me - barred. I n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e , t h e p l a i n t i f f ’ s § 1 9 8 3 a c t i o n w a s t i me - b a r r e d wh e n t h e f i r s t s u i t wa s d i s mi s s e d .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Timothy v. Bowling v. Lori Goff, Becky West, and the Johnson City Police Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-v-bowling-v-lori-goff-becky-west-and-the-j-tennctapp-2000.