TIMOTHY STULTZ and CAROLYN STULTZ v. BANKUNITED, N.A.
This text of TIMOTHY STULTZ and CAROLYN STULTZ v. BANKUNITED, N.A. (TIMOTHY STULTZ and CAROLYN STULTZ v. BANKUNITED, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
TIMOTHY STULTZ and CAROLYN STULTZ, Appellants,
v.
BANKUNITED, N.A., Appellee.
No. 4D19-1115
[May 21, 2020]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502018CA007570.
Taylor M. Claudon and Kendrick Almaguer of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for appellants.
William L. Grimsley and Peter J. Maskow of McGlinchey Stafford, Jacksonville, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. 1
LEVINE, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20-23 (the requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue a writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20-94 (suspending and tolling any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law for 45 days from April 2, 2020). We trust any motions directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our mandate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
TIMOTHY STULTZ and CAROLYN STULTZ v. BANKUNITED, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-stultz-and-carolyn-stultz-v-bankunited-na-fladistctapp-2020.