Timothy Stricker v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 4, 2010·No. 13-10-00103-CR·Published

Opinion

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00103-CR

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

TIMOTHY STRICKER,                                                                   Appellant,

                                                             v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                 Appellee.

                          On Appeal from the 105th District Court

                                       of Nueces County, Texas.

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela

                               Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, Timothy Stricker, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.  Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

4th day of November, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timothy Stricker v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Timothy Stricker v. State (Timothy Stricker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.