Timothy Spivy v. State
This text of Timothy Spivy v. State (Timothy Spivy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
CONTINUING ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Appellate case name: Timothy Spivy v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-13-00254-CR
Trial court case number: 1364113
Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County
On September 20, 2013, Appellant filed a Motion to Abate, explaining the trial court indicated a need for sixty (60) days to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding admissibility of statements made by appellant. On September 26, 2013, this Court abated this appeal for the trial court to provide those findings of fact and conclusions of law. We have received no response to that order of abatement. Counsel for appellant is ORDERED to work with the trial court to obtain the requested findings of fact and conclusions of law from the judge who presided over the trial. The district clerk is ORDERED to prepare and file a supplemental record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law within 20 days of the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature:/s/ Justice Rebeca Huddle Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: January 29, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Timothy Spivy v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-spivy-v-state-texapp-2014.