Timothy Reed, a Minor v. Joseph D. Bulman, Guardian Ad Litem of Timothy Reed, a Minor

D.C. Circuit

Timothy Reed, a Minor v. Joseph D. Bulman, Guardian Ad Litem of Timothy Reed, a Minor

244 F.2d 772, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 324, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3153

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 2, 1957

Docket13585

StatusPublished

This text of 244 F.2d 772 (Timothy Reed, a Minor v. Joseph D. Bulman, Guardian Ad Litem of Timothy Reed, a Minor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Timothy Reed, a Minor v. Joseph D. Bulman, Guardian Ad Litem of Timothy Reed, a Minor, 244 F.2d 772, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 324, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3153 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question on appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion in ordering that a fee awarded by the court to a guardian ad litem for a minor defendant should be paid from the estate of said minor in favor of whom judgment had been rendered in the litigation which gave rise to the apointment of the guardian ad litem. The alternative was for the District Court to order that the fee be paid by the unsuccessful plaintiffs. See section 13-105 D.C.Code 1951. We find no abuse of discretion in the order as made and it accordingly is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The question on appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion in ordering that a fee awarded by the court to a guardian ad litem for a minor defendant should be paid from the estate of said minor in favor of whom judgment had been rendered in the litigation which gave rise to the apointment of the guardian ad litem. The alternative was for the District Court to order that the fee be paid by the unsuccessful plaintiffs. See section 13-105 D.C.Code 1951. We find no abuse of discretion in the order as made and it accordingly is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 F.2d 772, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 324, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-reed-a-minor-v-joseph-d-bulman-guardian-ad-litem-of-timothy-cadc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack