Timothy Ray Grant v. Andrea Elease Myers

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 2, 2016
Docket13-16-00338-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Timothy Ray Grant v. Andrea Elease Myers (Timothy Ray Grant v. Andrea Elease Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timothy Ray Grant v. Andrea Elease Myers, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00338-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

TIMOTHY RAY GRANT, Appellant,

v.

ANDREA ELEASE MYERS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Timothy Ray Grant, appealed a judgment entered by the 329th District

Court of Wharton County, Texas. On June 27, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified

appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 9.5(e) and 25.1(d)(4). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e), 25.1(d)(4). The Clerk

directed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of that notice. On August 8, 2016, the Clerk notified appellant that

the defect had not been corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be

dismissed if the defect was not cured within ten days. Appellant has not responded to

the notice from the Clerk or corrected the defect.

On July 28, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant, in accordance with

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the

$205.00 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not responded

to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $205.00 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to

correct the defect or pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be

dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this 2nd day of September, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Timothy Ray Grant v. Andrea Elease Myers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-ray-grant-v-andrea-elease-myers-texapp-2016.