Timothy Paul Bradshaw v. the State of Texas

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 3, 2025

NO. 03-24-00091-CR

Timothy Paul Bradshaw, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS AND CRUMP AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 3, 2025

NO. 03-24-00092-CR

Timothy Paul Bradshaw, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS AND CRUMP AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 3, 2025

NO. 03-24-00093-CR

Timothy Paul Bradshaw, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS AND CRUMP AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.