Timothy Paul Bradshaw v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Timothy Paul Bradshaw v. the State of Texas

DecidedApril 3, 2025

Docket03-24-00093-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Timothy Paul Bradshaw v. the State of Texas (Timothy Paul Bradshaw v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Timothy Paul Bradshaw v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 3, 2025

NO. 03-24-00091-CR

Timothy Paul Bradshaw, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS AND CRUMP AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs

is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00092-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS AND CRUMP AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs

NO. 03-24-00093-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS AND CRUMP AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs

is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 3, 2025

NO. 03-24-00091-CR

Timothy Paul Bradshaw, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS AND CRUMP AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs

is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00092-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS AND CRUMP AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs

NO. 03-24-00093-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS AND CRUMP AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs

is made.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Timothy Paul Bradshaw v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-paul-bradshaw-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.