Timothy P. Coyne v. SPCP Cobblestone Owner, LLC
Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-25-00283-CV
TIMOTHY P. COYNE, Appellant V.
SPCP COBBLESTONE OWNER, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2025-002739-1
Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant’s brief was due on October 30, 2025. On November 18, 2025, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, on or before December 1, 2025, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: December 18, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timothy P. Coyne v. SPCP Cobblestone Owner, LLC (Timothy P. Coyne v. SPCP Cobblestone Owner, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.