Timothy Lee Newton v. Jeremiah Nixon

110 F. App'x 734
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2004·No. 04-2562·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Lee Newton brought an action for damages, claiming the Missouri Attorney General had engaged in fraud when he opposed Newton’s earlier federal habeas corpus petition. The district court * viewed this action as an attempt to revive the habeas case, and dismissed the complaint. After careful review, we conclude dismissal was proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). Newton’s action was legally frivolous because it depended on the habeas court’s having wrongly determined his petition was time-barred. See Kelly v. Armstrong, 141 F.3d 799, 801 (8th Cir.1998) (issue preclusion). Accordingly, *735 we affirm. We deny Newton’s pending motions.

*

The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timothy Lee Newton v. Jeremiah Nixon, 110 F. App'x 734 (8th Cir. 2004).

110 F. App'x 734 (Timothy Lee Newton v. Jeremiah Nixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. Armstrong
141 F.3d 799 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)