Timothy Lee Barnum v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Order entered September 1, 2022
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-00275-CR
TIMOTHY LEE BARNUM, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 15th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 069939
ORDER
Before the court is appellant Timothy Lee Barnum’s motion to receive the
appellate record furnished without charge. In the motion, Barnum explains he
wishes to pursue habeas relief and requires the reporter’s record to establish the
merits of his case.
Because there is no requirement that a petition for discretionary review
include a copy of the trial record, indigent defendants are not entitled to a free copy
of the trial record for preparation of a petition for discretionary review. Ex parte Trainer, 181 S.W.3d 358, 359 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). “For similar reasons, an
indigent defendant is not entitled either as a matter of equal protection or of due
process to a free transcription of prior proceedings for use in pursuing post-
conviction habeas corpus relief.” In re Jones, Nos. 05-16-00001-CV, 05-16-00002-
CV, 2016 WL 279432, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 22, 2016, orig. proceeding)
(mem. op., not designated for publication).
Barnum has no right to a free copy of the appellate record at this time. We
therefore DENY the motion.
/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timothy Lee Barnum v. the State of Texas (Timothy Lee Barnum v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.