Timothy Lamont Williams v. Dan R. Lawson, Warden Jim Beale, Assistant Warden C. Irving, Lieutenant Wayne Brown, Operations Officer

Fourth Circuit

Timothy Lamont Williams v. Dan R. Lawson, Warden Jim Beale, Assistant Warden C. Irving, Lieutenant Wayne Brown, Operations Officer

56 F.3d 63, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19161, 1995 WL 318448

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1995

Docket95-6184

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 63 (Timothy Lamont Williams v. Dan R. Lawson, Warden Jim Beale, Assistant Warden C. Irving, Lieutenant Wayne Brown, Operations Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Timothy Lamont Williams v. Dan R. Lawson, Warden Jim Beale, Assistant Warden C. Irving, Lieutenant Wayne Brown, Operations Officer, 56 F.3d 63, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19161, 1995 WL 318448 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 63
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Timothy Lamont WILLIAMS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Dan R. LAWSON, Warden; Jim Beale, Assistant Warden; C.
Irving, Lieutenant; Wayne Brown, Operations
Officer, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6184.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995
Decided May 25, 1995

Timothy Lamont Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Lawson, No. CA-94-1455 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 63
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Timothy Lamont WILLIAMS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Dan R. LAWSON, Warden; Jim Beale, Assistant Warden; C.
Irving, Lieutenant; Wayne Brown, Operations
Officer, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6184.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995
Decided May 25, 1995

Timothy Lamont Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Lawson, No. CA-94-1455 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 63, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19161, 1995 WL 318448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-lamont-williams-v-dan-r-lawson-warden-jim--ca4-1995.