Timothy L. Jarquin v. Danny R. Blanks, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member and Manager of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.; Barlow J. Cook, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.; James R. Washington, III, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.; And Mary Leblanc, Individually and in Her Capacity as Director of Human Resources of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.
Opinion
TIMOTHY L. JARQUIN * NO. 2019-CA-0309
VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL
DANNY R. BLANKS, * FOURTH CIRCUIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A MEMBER * STATE OF LOUISIANA AND MANAGER OF PONTCHARTRAIN ******* PARTNERS, L.L.C.; BARLOW J. COOK, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A MEMBER OF PONTCHARTRAIN PARTNERS, L.L.C.; JAMES R. WASHINGTON, III, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A MEMBER OF PONTCHARTRAIN PARTNERS, L.L.C.; AND MARY LEBLANC, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES OF PONTCHARTRAIN PARTNERS, L.L.C.
APPEAL FROM
CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2017-10461, DIVISION “G-11” Honorable Robin M. Giarrusso, Judge ******
Judge Regina Bartholomew-Woods ******
(Court composed of Judge Terri F. Love, Judge Regina Bartholomew-Woods, Judge Paula A. Brown)
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
Stephen D. Marx P.J. Stakelum III CHEHARDY, SHERMAN. WILLIAMS, RECILE, STAKELUM & HAYES, L.L.P. One Galleria Boulevard, Suite 1100 Metairie, LA 70001
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE
Jason R. Anders ANDERS LAW FIRM 650 Poydras Street, Suite 1400 New Orleans, LA 70130
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT
LIMITED REHEARING GRANTED SEPTEMBER 11, 2019
On application for rehearing, Timothy Jarquin, Appellee, seeks amendment
of this Court’s August 21, 2019 opinion. Appellant, Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C,
had appealed the district court’s December 27, 2018 judgment denying its motion
to quash, arguing that Appellee, who had filed a subpoena duces tecum, was
seeking information protected by the attorney-client privilege. On appeal, this
Court vacated the district court’s judgment and remanded for additional analysis of
the attorney-client privilege claim.
We grant Appellee’s application for rehearing for the limited purpose of
clarifying that our prior opinion vacating the judgment is directed only to that
portion of the judgment denying the motion to quash despite an arguable claim of
attorney-client privilege to the information sought. In all other respects, the
original judgment shall stand, as Appellant did not raise any other claims on appeal
apart from privilege.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timothy L. Jarquin v. Danny R. Blanks, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member and Manager of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.; Barlow J. Cook, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.; James R. Washington, III, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.; And Mary Leblanc, Individually and in Her Capacity as Director of Human Resources of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C. (Timothy L. Jarquin v. Danny R. Blanks, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member and Manager of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.; Barlow J. Cook, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.; James R. Washington, III, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.; And Mary Leblanc, Individually and in Her Capacity as Director of Human Resources of Pontchartrain Partners, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.