Timothy Hartman v. State of Florida
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
TIMOTHY HARTMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0977
[July 2, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Thomas J. Coleman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-006875-CF10A.
Timothy Hartman, Blountstown, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 2025 WL 1561151, at *5 (Fla. 2025) (even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change of law, it does not apply retroactively).
CIKLIN, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timothy Hartman v. State of Florida (Timothy Hartman v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.